很多小伙伴玩家都不太清楚mistranslation 急用!!!，那么今天解雕侠小编给大家带来一篇 相关的文章，希望大家看了之后能有所收获，最后请大家持续关注我们！
其实mistranslation的问题并不复杂，但是又很多的朋友都不太了解高手帮忙翻译,旅游方面,不要在线翻译,,谢谢,,急用!!!，因此呢，今天小编就来为大家分享mistranslation的一些知识，希望可以帮助到大家，下面我们一起来看看这个问题的分析吧！
高手帮忙翻译,旅游方面,不要在线翻译,,谢谢,,急用!!!
首先,同一个景点译名不同,常常会有三四个译名,导致译名紊乱。广西省柳州市风景宜人,市内有许多公园,常常令游客流连忘返,但是这些公园的译名却不统一,不同的地方常常写着不同的译名。例如:“鱼峰公园”有4个译名:StandingFishPark,Standing-fishHillPark,YufengPark和YufengSceneryDistrict;“雀山公园型尘”有3个译名:Que’erShanPark,QueShanPark和Que’erHillPark;“鹅山公园”也有三个译名:EShanPark,ErshanHillParkandErshanYouthPark。同样的问题存在于南京雨花台烈士陵园,同一个景点也具有多个英译名。“雨花石博物馆”在北门导游图译名为RainFlowerStoneMeseum,在群雕前导游图译名为YuhuaPebblesMuseum,在景区功能分布图上译名则为TheMuseumofYuhuaStones,而在景点指示牌上则被译为RainflowerPebblesMuseum。其他很多景点如“忠魂亭、梅廊、二忠祠,御碑亭、江南第二泉、烈士群雕像”等等也同样有着两个或两个以上的译名,不太规范。
不同的译名是因为译者采取了不同的翻译方法,这会让国外游客产生疑惑:这些不同的译名指的是同一个景点还是不同的景点?这影响了旅游宣传介绍的效果。与此同时,译名的紊乱也影响了景区的形象。因此有必要统一规范景点名称的翻译,提升旅游景点的形象,以吸引更多的游客
其次,译者忽略景点名称背后的文化信息而导致误译。译者在翻译的时候如果没有对景点名称的来源或者文化内涵多加推敲,而是想当然地根据字面纤嫌意思来翻译,常常会导致错误的翻译。在《金佛山》的旅游简介中,有一景点名称“金山烟雨”被译为“SmokingRainofJinshan”。实际上,这里的“烟雨”是指“蒙蒙细雨”或“雨雾”,并非“烟雾”,“SmokingRain”显然是误译,因此建议改译为“GoldenMountaininMistyRain”。苏州城景点“寒山寺”被译为“ColdMountainTemple”,这也是由于译者忽略了寺名背后的文化信息而导致错译。事实上,去过苏州的人都知道,寒山寺那里根本没有什么山,寒山寺位于苏州城西5公里外的枫桥镇,始建于梁,因唐代高僧寒山曾在寺内住持,故名“寒山寺”。所以“寒山”实际上是高僧的法号,“coldmountain”显然是一种误译。
再次,译者忽略中英文语言文化差异,导致误译。河南开封著名景点“清明上河园”被译成“Parkwithup-the-River-on-ChingmingFestivalviews”。在英文里面,“uptheriver”是一个俚语,意思是“坐监狱”。而清明上河园是一个主题公园,是人们放松、休闲娱乐的地方,上述译名容易让国外游客误解,产生负面联想。开封市内的另一景点“包公祠”被译为“TheMemorialTempleofLordBao”,这里“LordBao”虽然保持了语言形式通顺,但并不易懂。包拯是一位历史人物,他的形象代表着清正廉洁,在国内和海外华人的心目中有着很高的声誉,“包大人”是人们对他的尊称。“Lord”并不能反映出这种存在于中华文化中的尊敬与景仰之情,意义上的不对等无法准确传递出景点名称的文化内涵。
由于语言文化差异,汉语中的某些表达在翻译卜竖禅中确实存在着不可译性,但是过度的音译会影响到景点名称信息的传达,使国外游客难以领会到景点名称的内涵,降低译文的信息量和可读性,从而影响译文的质量。因此,译者在翻译的时候应该慎重考虑,尽量选择合适的翻译方法。
景点名称翻译中存在的种种问题,说明景点名称的翻译现状有待提高,也从一个侧面告诉我们景点名称翻译的复杂性,译者在翻译时绝不可掉以轻心,想当然地草草下手,而应该多加推敲
大家帮帮忙翻译啊
这弯竖升是自己翻译的。
Besides,thereexistsdifferencesinthelogicthinkingofwesterncultureandChineseculture,pleasereadtheexamples:
3.Nobodycouldbetoofoolishtoday.
Thedirecttranslationofthesentencewouldbe,"Todaynobodycanbetoofoolish",butthenyou'纤首dbemakingabigmistake.Becausethisisthedoublenegativeconstructionofthereversethinking.Thecorrecttranslationwouldbe,"Today,nomatterhowfoolishyouappear,therewillalwaysbesomeonemoreoutrageousthanyou."
4.Itisimpossibletooverestimatethevalueoftheinvention.
Thisisanotherdoublenegativeconstructionwhichmanifestsreversethinking.Ifitweredirecttranslated,itwouldbe,"埋老Toover-estimatethisinventionwouldbeimpossible",whichisfarfromtheoriginalmeaning.Thecorrecttranslationwouldbe,"Nomatterhowhighthevalueofthisinventionisbeingestimated,itwouldneverbetoohigh."
Ascouldbeseen,intheprocessofthetranslation,onlyafterunderstandingthedifferencesinperceptionandthinkingprocessofdifferentcultureswouldonebeabletoavoidmistakesintranslation,inordertoachievehavingdonehalftheworkanddoubletheresults.
3.Theinfluencesanalogyandhabitexpressionhasontranslation
Analogyandhabitexpressionisapartoflanguagewhichisfullofculturalcharacteristics,andisalsooneofthemainreasonsduringthetranslatingprocessthatcouldbeeasilyleadtoobstaclesinperception.Onlytogodeepintoresearch,comparison,understandingthedifferencesinperceptionandhabitexpressioninthetwolanguages,inordertoavoidtheobstaclesofperceptionandreallybeabletotranslateprecisely.Duetoculturaldifferences,differentcultureshavedifferentrecognitionofthesameworldanddifferentwaysofviewingit,thusthereexistsdifferentobjectswhichareusedasmetaphors,thephenomenonofhavingsimilarmetaphors,whichisthedifferenceinthefigureofspeech.Pleaselookatthephrasesbelow,whichareinEnglishtoChinese:
Besides,therearealsodifferencesinthehabitexpressionsofthetwolanguages,pleaselookattheexamples:
asstrongashorse气壮如牛
asblindasabat鼠目寸光
forthebirds对牛弹琴
gooseflesh鸡皮疙瘩
somethingfishy蛛丝马迹
aswiseasanowl像猴子一样聪明
alionintheway拦路虎
lickone�sboots拍马屁
Diamondcutsdiamond棋逢对手
Aflashinapan昙花一现
Haveonefootinthegrave风烛残年
Togrowlikemushrooms雨后春笋
5.Ifyoueverthinkheislazy,thinkagain.
Ifthisweredirectlytranslated,itwouldbe,"Ifyouthinkhe'slazy,thenthinkoncemore."Fromthesurfaceitlooksprettyloyaltotheoriginaltext,butintruthitneglectedthecharacteristicofhabitexpressionintheEnglishlanguageinspecificsituations,buttechnicallyitdidn'ttranslatetherealmeaningatall.Thecorrecttranslationwouldbe,"Ifyouthinkhe'slazy,thenyou'rewrong."
请英语高手帮忙翻译
Thedefinitionoflawfromthetransliterationofview,transliterationmethodthanothermethods,inthetranslationoftheintroductionofprofessionalandtechnicalterms,placenamesandpropernouns,suchastradenamesaremorecommonlyused.Moreover,whointheprocessoftransformingabilingualcalltoretaintheoriginalintegrityoftheobviouspronunciation,itsoundsparticularlytouchestheheart.Forexample:"tea,spreadfromChinatotheworld,EnglishteaoriginatedinFujiandialect'tea'inthepronunciation"[2]369Englishwonton(wonton),yamen(governmentoffices),mafoo(groom),xiucai(scholar)andsoon.Inthisway,hasmanagedtomaintainthesemanticcharacteristicsofChineseculture,butalsoattractedtheattentionofreaders,andyetconformtothelanguageofcommunicationenvironment.However,transliterationisnotperfect,forexample,soldonthemarketcalledtheday-to-daywashsuppliesLUX,anditsChinesenameas"Book",justlookatthisChinesename,sopeoplemustthinkfirstofallisHercules,theywithwell-developedmuscles,superiorathleticability,itisdifficulttomakepeoplethinkofusingthisproducttoachievethekindofcomfort,thefeelingofmoisture.Thishasresultedinthetroubledreaders.
B),literaltranslation
So,whatistheliteraltranslation?Thereisnoconclusion.Butanargumentcanbeused,thatisaskedinthelanguagespecificationdoesnotrunaswellaserrorscausedbythepremiseofLenovo,bothintranslationandtheoriginalcontentsoftheoriginalform,inparticular,tomaintaintheoriginaltextreferstothemetaphor,imageandlocalcolor,suchasthePresidentfortranslation[7].Goalistoachievetheunityofformandcontent,thatis,"shape","God"inboth.Suchasthe"ironricebowl"straighttoironricebowl;"red"straighttoredpacket;"open-doorpolicy"open-doorpolicy;"townshipenterprises"townshipandvillageenterprises;"illegal"blackmarket"timeismoney"Timeismoneyandsoon,whichistheexpressionofthetranslationofthecontentsoftheoriginalterms,butalsotopreservetheoriginaltermsoftheanalogy.Buttheliteraltranslationtothetranslatoroftencausedbya"deadlanguage"oftheloopholes里钻,translationofthevocabulary,thearticlewillbeveryrigid,whentheuseofliteraltranslationtopayparticularattentiontothispoint.
(C),freetranslation
Freetranslation,simplyput,isstraightforwardtotranslatethemeaningof[8].Suchas"proprietarytechnology"technicalknow-how"threesentencesalwaysour"talkshopallthetime"landoffishandrice"alandofhoneyandmilk"smallsavings,wasteofbig/smallsmart,poundfoolish"Pennywise,poundfoolish;"Greatfoodstalls"sidewalksnackboothandsoon,whichisaparaphraseofwordsimpliesdeepunderstandingofjusticewillfindeachotherthroughculturesimilarthingsinthescene,usedtoconveythetrueinformationcontainedintheoriginalvocabulary.Itliesinmass"God"isnot"shaped"like.Ofcourse,thetranslationalsotherearesomeshortcomings.Manyforeignwords,onewordcorrespondstomorethanoneinterpretation,therelativelackoftranslationinthecontextofthetime,thetranslatorcannotbeaccuratelyonthechoiceofitstranslation,resultinginmistranslation;Inaddition,translationofacronyms,wewilllackofemergenceofthephenomenonofinformation:IftheCDisoftensaidtheChineseexplanationfortheCD,andCD'sfullnameshouldbe"Compactdisk",whichthe"compact"thewordclose,compact,lightweightmeans,justfromtheEnglishvocabularylevel,itisdifficulttothinkofwhatthisphraseassociatedwiththelaser.
什么是termpaper包括哪些内容
termpape就是“学期报告”
示例：
TermpaperfortheCourseofTranslation
ComputerTranslationofHomonymyandPolysemy
Inthispaper,Iwanttodiscusscomputertranslationfromtheperspectiveofitstreatmenttohomonymyandpolysemy.Thetermhomonymyisusedwhenoneformhastwoormoreunrelatedmeanings.Examplesofhomonymsarethepairbank(ofariver)—bank(financialinstitution).Thetermpolysemyreferstoawordwithrelatedmeanings.Forinstance,theword“head”canbeusedtodescribetheobjectonthetopofthebody,thatontopofaglassofbeer,orthechiefofadepartmentofacompany.
First,IwillexplaintheimportanceofthetreatmenttohomonymyandpolysemyintranslationfromSociosemiotictheories.ThestudyofmeaningplaysanessentialroleintheschoolofSociosemiotics.Meaningisdefinedfromtheangleoftherelationshipbetweenthesignandsomethingoutit,inotherwords,theattributeofthesignorthesymbol.Moreover,therelationshipisclassifiedintothatbetweensignsandentities,betweensignsandusers,andbetweensignsthemselves,givingrisetothreekindsofmeanings:referentialmeaning,pragmaticmeaningandintralingualmeaning.Referentialmeaningservesasthefoundationoftranslation.Withoutcorrectidentificationofreferentialmeaning,translationwilleitherbebuiltonsandorturnintothecastleintheair.TheschoolofSociosemioticsattachesgreatimportancetotherealizationofmeaningpotentials.Thecorrectreferenceisamustforthisprocessofrealization.Almosteverynounhasitsreferentialmeaning,butasaspecialgroupofnouns,homonymyandpolysemyposespecialdifficultyinfindingouttheirreferentialmeanings.Asexplainedatthebeginning,homonymyandpolysemybothhaveanumberofmeanings,relatedorunrelated.Thereforeintranslation,thetranslatorisfacedwiththeimmediateproblemofidentifyingthecorrectreferencewithinthecontext.Inotherwords,hehastocarryoutthejobofdisambiguation.Thisisthesameincomputertranslation.
Sadly,importantastheproblemmaybe,itseemstobeoverlooked.Thetestingguidelineformachinetranslation,detailedenoughtoincludeaclassificationofthepluralformsofnouns,excludesthetestofpolysemyandhomonymy.Itisofgreatimportanceforustoexaminehowcomputersdealwiththisproblem,nomatterhowdifficultitmayprovetobe.
Inordertohaveaclearideaofthedifficultyofcomputerinhandlingthisproblem,weneedtofirstlookintotheprocessofhowhumanbeingsresolvethisproblem.Humanbeingscanclearawaythiskindofambiguitybyresortingtohiscognitiveabilities.Theoretically,theprocessofdisambiguationgoesthroughthefollowingthreesteps.Iwilltake“bank”asanexampletoillustratehowthehearercanclarifytheambiguityduetoitsfeatureofhomonymy.Supposetwofriendsrunintoeachothernearariver.Onesays,“thebankisbeautiful.”Howdoesthehearerinterpretthereferenceof“bank”?First,heresortstothephysicalsurroundingandthereferenceofriverbankimmediatelycomestomind.Inthisway,theambiguityisremoved.Supposetwofriendsareinadormitorychatting.Onesays,“thebankisbeautiful.”Howcanthehearerinterpretthiswordwithoutanyhintfromphysicalsurrounding?Inthiscase,hehastotracethiswordbacktohisworkingmemory,andthenitoccurstohisthattheymeteachotherontheriverbankthedaybefore.Therefore,herealizesthatthespeakermustbereferringtotheplacetheymet.Workingmemoryisthesecondstepifnoreferencecanbedrawnfromphysicalsurroundings.Suppose,twofriendsmeetonstreetandonesays,“Iamonmywaytothebank.Theysentmethewrongbillagain!”Inthiscontext,thehearercannolongerrelyonthephysicalsurroundingorworkingmemoryfordisambiguation.Therefore,hehastoemployhis“knowledgeoftheworld”forclarification,whichwilltellhimthatariverbankcanneversendsomeoneabill.Inthisway,hecanfigureoutthatthespeakeristalkingaboutthefinancialinstitute.
TheaboveisanillustrationputforwardbySperberandWilsonasanexampleofcognitivecapabilitiesofhumanbeings.Fromthisexample,wecanseethatoneresortstohisphysicalsurroundings,workingmemoryandknowledgeofthewordtoclarifytheambiguitycausedbyhomonymy.Therefore,itseemsthatcomputerhastobeequippedwiththesameabilitiesinordertoperformthejob.Let’sexaminethetranslationofonefamoussoftware“东方快车”inChina.
Generallyspeaking,thetranslationsoftwarecantosomeextentdistinguishdifferentreferencesofawordandpickoutthecorrectonebaseduponthecontext.Thefollowingtranslationisdoneby“东方快车2003”.
1.Thebirdhasinterestingbills.鸟有有趣的帐单。
2.Thebillwaspassed.法案被通过。
3.Iwassentthewrongbillbythecompany.我被公司送错误的法案。
4.Ireceivedmybillyesterday.昨天我收到帐单。
Herethehomonymy“bill”istranslatedwithindifferentcontext.Thoughthesentencesareshort,theyhaveprovidedenoughcluesfordisambiguation.Mostpeoplewon’thavemuchdifficultyinpointingouttherightreferentialmeaningofthewordinthesesentences.However,aswecansee,computersareincapableofclearidentification.Thefirsttranslationdoesnotmakeanysense,whichmaybeattributedtotheincompletecollectionofreferentialmeaningsof“bill”.Herethewordmeansthejawsofabirdtogetherwiththeirhornycovering.Probablythismeaningisexcludedfromthedictionary.Thetranslationofthethirdsentenceisalsoproblematic.Mostpeoplewillinterpretthebillasakindofaccount,ratherthanlegalbill.Thismistranslationshouldbeattributedtoadifferentreason,sincethereferentialmeaningofaccountisincludedinthedictionary,asillustratedinthetranslationofthefourthsentence.Apparentlyherethecomputerfailstoidentifythecorrectreferentialmeaning.Let’stryanotherword“head”.Thefollowingtranslationisperformedbythesamesoftware.
1.Useyourheadandthink!使用你的头并且想！
2.Twoheadsarebetterthanone.2个头是更好与比一个。
3.Heads,Iwin.头，我赢。
4.Heisattheheadofclass.他在班的头。
5.Heistheheadofschool.他是学校的头。
6.HeistheheadoftheEnglishDepartment.他是英语的部门的领导。
Thisgroupofsentencescontainsanumberofmistranslationsaswell.Liketheword“bill”,thereferentialmeaningsof“head”arenotcomplete,evidencedbythetranslationofthethirdsentence.Thefirsttwosentencesarenottranslatedverywell,because“head”inboththesetwosentencesreferstosomethingintellectualinsteadofsomethingphysical.Whatismoreinterestingisthelasttwosentences,inwhichthewordshouldbeinterpretedas“chiefofanorganization”both.However,withalmostthesamestructure,thewordistranslateddifferently.Fromthiscomparison,itisclearthatthereisstillgreatrandomnessinchoosingthecorrectreferentialmeaning.Thiskindofarbitrarychoicecanbefurtherprovedbythefollowingexample.
Iwassentthebill.我被送帐单。
Iwassentthewrongbill.我被送错误的法案。
Itisridiculoustochangethetranslationof“bill”simplybecauseanadjectiveisadded.Morethanthat,thisadjectivemakesitmoreexplicitthatthebillherereferstoaccountinsteadoflegalbill.Randomnessinchoiceofreferentialmeaningassertsitselfclearly.
Thereasonforthiskindofmistranslationisself—evident.Computersarenotendowedwithcognitivecapabilities,atleastatpresent,toidentifythecorrectreferentialmeaning,bymeansofphysicalsurrounding,workingmemoryorknowledgeoftheworld.Whatcomputerscanrelyonisfromsheerinput.Therefore,thequestionfacingcomputertranslationishowtomakethefulluseofinput.Togivethequestionatentativeanswer,IproposeasolutionfromthetheoryofRelevance.
AsthelatesttheoryinPragmatics,thetheoryofRelevancestartsfromthefieldofconversationanalysisandhasbeenplayinganincreasinglyimportantroleinvariouslinguisticareas.Itsapplicationhasevenbeenextendedbeyondliteraryworkstofieldslikeadvertisement.Therearetwomajorideasthatcanbeborrowedfromthetheorytocomputertranslation.Oneistheprincipleofeconomyandtheotheristheviewpointofreconstruction.
ThetheoryofRelevanceholdsthebeliefthathearersofaconversationalwaystrytomaketheleastefforttocomprehendasmuchaspossible,whichiscalledtheprincipleofeconomy.Thisprincipleisveryenlighteninginthedesignoftranslationsoftware.Forinstance,whenpeopleseetheword“bill”intheirdailylife,mostpeoplewillassociateitwithallkindofaccountstheyreceiveeveryday.Therefore,whentheyencounterthewordinnaturalconversation,theyalwayspresupposethereferentialmeaningofwordtobeaccounts,ratherthanakindoflegaldocument,unlesssomethingelseinthiscontextchangestheirmind,likethephrase“BillofRights”.Aslongasthepresuppositionalmeaningdoesnotdetercomprehension,thehearerwon’tbothertomakeanyefforttochangeit.Inthesameway,everywordorphraseshouldbegivena“defaultmeaning”incomputertranslation.Itisparticularlyimportantforhomonymyandpolysemy,sincetheycontaintwoorevenmorereferentialmeanings.Ifeveryhomonymyandpolysemycanbegivenadefaultmeaning,aslongasthedefaultmeaningdoesnothinderthetranslationoftherestofthesentence,thereisnoneedtotryanotherreferentialmeaning.TheprocessisthesameashowhumanbeingsunderstandconversationsaccordingthetheoryofRelevance.Inthisway,moreresourcescanbesavedtoanalyzeandtranslateotherpartsofthesentence.
Inevitablyanotherquestionfollows:humanbeingscanset“defaultmeaning”ofawordbyhislifeexperience,howcancomputerdoso?Inordertosolvethisproblem,weneedtoresorttocorpustechnology.InCorpusLinguistics,ithasbecomeawidely—acceptedpracticetodescribeawordfromtheresourcesinacertaincorpus.Thesamecanbeappliedtotheclassificationofthereferentialmeaningofhomonymyandpolysemy.Thedefaultmeaningshouldbethereferentialmeaningwiththehighestfrequency,baseduponthecalculationoftherelevantitemscollectedinthecorpus.
TheotherviewpointfromthetheoryofRelevancethatcanshedsomelightoncomputertranslationisthereconstructiontheory.Itisanaturalstepwhenone’spresuppositionalmeaningcannotfitinthecontextanymore.Hehastocomeupwithanewreferentialmeaningandreconstructthecontext.Thequestionfacingcomputertranslationishowcanthecomputerknowthedefaultmeaningofahomonymyorpolysemydoesnotfitintothelinguisticcontext.Anumberofapproachescanbetried,andIchoosetheapproachfromcollocation,inparticularprepositionalcollocationtoillustratetheprocess.
Ifahomonymyorpolysemyiswithinaprepositionalphrase,theprepositionassociatedwiththenouncanhelpthecomputertodecideonthecorrectreferentialmeaning.Take“bank”asanexample.Ifthecomputerlocatesthepreposition“in”nearthenoun,chancesarethatheretheword“bank”herereferstothefinancialinstitute.However,iftheprepositionis“on”,inmostcasesthewordmeansthebankoftheriver.Ofcourse,itisonlyanelementaryjudgment.Onecannotcountontheprepositiontomakeoutthedefinitemeaning.Sentenceslikethefollowingonemayposeconsiderabledifficultytothecomputer.
IwillgiveatalkonthebankinChina.
Normally,syntacticanalysisoftranslationsoftwarewilltreat“onthebankinChina”asoneprepositionalphrase,insteadofthemodifierofthenoun“talk”.However,nomatterwhichreferentialmeaningonechoosestointerpretthissentence,thefollowingtranslationdonebythesoftwaremakeslittlesense.
在银行上在中国我将给一次谈话。
Thelinkbetweentheprepositionandthenounstillneedsstatisticalverificationfromcorpus.HereIcanonlygiveabriefexplanationtodemonstratethattosomeextentcorpuslinguisticsisaviableandvaluableapproachtosolvethisproblem.Though12.21%ofallwordsinBrownCorpusarepropositions,(inLOBCorpusthecorrespondingfigureis12.34%)about90%ofallprepositionaluseismadeupofonly14mostfrequentprepositions.Therefore,thequestionleftunsolvedinhowtoenumeratethepossiblenounsfollowingtheprepositions.Ofcourse,itisafantasytolistallthepossiblenounsthatcangoafteraparticularpreposition.Nevertheless,itispossibletoexhaustallthehomonymyandpolysemyincommonuse.Moreimportantly,ifwespecifytheprecedingprepositionsbeforeahomonymyorpolysemy,thelikelihoodofmistranslationcanbereducedtoagreatextent.Numerousexamplescanbefoundamongthehomonymy.Ifprepositionscanbetakenintoaccountincomputertranslation,thefollowingmistranslationsdoneby“东方快车2003”canbeavoided.
Atthepointof:在意义的
Tothepointof到意义的
Inthepointof:在意义的
Obviously,therespectiveprepositionsandthenoun“point”aretranslatedseparatelyandthenaddedtogether.
Ifcomputercantakeintoconsiderationotherhintslikethearticlesintranslatingprepositionalphraseswithhomonymyorpolysemy,chancesarethatmistranslationcanbefurtherremoved.Forinstance,boththeprepositionalphrases“attheheartof”and“atheart”arelistedasfrequentoccurringcollocationsinLOBCorpus.Needlesstosay,theydifferinmeaning,inspiteoftheidenticalprecedingpreposition.Therefore,whatthecomputercanrelyonwithinthephrasetodifferentiatethemeaningisnootherthantheexistenceofthearticle“the”.
Asamatteroffact,prepositionalphraseisonlyonekindofcollocation.Themorecollocations(orformulaicphrases)canbetakenintoconsiderationincomputertranslation,themoreaccuratethecomputertranslationwillbecome.
Inthispaper,Idiscusscomputertranslationofhomonymyandpolysemy.Correctidentifyingofthereferentialmeaningisamustfortranslation,sinceitisdescribedasthebasisincomprehensioninSociosemiotics.Homonymyandpolysemyareagroupofwordsthatposespecialdifficultytotheidentificationofreferentialmeaning,especiallytocomputer,whicharenotendowedwithreasoningcapacitylikehumanbeings.Importantastheproblemmightbe,itisoverlookedandtherebyleadstoconsiderablemistranslation.IanalyzethereasonsforthismistranslationandcomeupwiththelinguistictheoryofRelevancetolookattheissue.Itissuggestedthatadefaultmeaningofahomonymyorpolysemyshouldbesetupandreconstructingthemeaningbenecessaryfromthecontext.Acorpus—basedapproachshouldbeconsideredindoingso.Fromtheanalysisofthecollocationofhomonymyandpolysemy,itismorelikelyforthecomputertofigureoutthecorrectreferentialmeaning.
Reference:
Biber,D.etal.CorpusLinguistics.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2000.
Halliday,M.A.K.LanguageasSocialSemiotic:TheSocialInterpretationofLanguageandMeaning.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2001.
Kennedy,G.AnIntroductiontoCorpusLinguistics.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2000.
Sperber,Detal.Relevance:CommunicationandCognition.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2001.
Thomas,J.etal.UsingCorpusforLanguageResearch.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2001.
Yule,G.TheStudyofLanguage.ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2000.
何自然.Grice语用学说与关联理论.外语教学与研究，1995：23—27.
熊学亮.CognitivePragmatics.上海外语教育出版社，1999.
mistranslation的介绍就聊到这里吧，感谢你花时间阅读本站内容，更多关于高手帮忙翻译,旅游方面,不要在线翻译,,谢谢,,急用!!!、mistranslation的信息别忘了在本站进行查找哦。
上面就是mistranslation 急用!!!的全部内容了，希望能给广大手游玩家玩家们带来一些帮助，更多关于的内容，尽在解雕侠!
